Waqf Related Fact Checking
In recent years, the topic of Waqf has attracted significant public attention, especially amid discussions on land rights, religious endowments, and the authority of Waqf Boards in India. With this increased focus, a range of myths, half-truths, and misinformation have begun circulating widely — particularly on social media platforms. This blog aims to fact-check some of the most common claims related to Waqf, grounding each in verified information sourced from law, history, and government records.
What Is Waqf?
To begin with, it’s crucial to understand what Waqf actually means. In Islamic law, Waqf refers to a permanent and irrevocable dedication of a property for religious, pious, or charitable purposes. It may include buildings, land, cash, or even movable assets. Once a property is declared Waqf, it becomes inalienable — meaning it cannot be sold, inherited, or transferred.
In India, the management and regulation of Waqf properties are governed by the Waqf Act, 1995, as amended in 2013. The Act provides for the establishment of State Waqf Boards, a Central Waqf Council, and Waqf Tribunals for dispute resolution. Let’s explore some frequently circulated claims and assess them through a factual lens.
Claim 1: Waqf Boards Can Declare Any Land as Waqf Without Proof
Verdict: False
This claim reflects a major misunderstanding of how Waqf property is identified and registered. According to Section 40 of the Waqf Act, a Waqf Board may initiate an inquiry if it believes a property is Waqf. However, a due process is mandatory. The property owner must be notified, and the matter can be contested before a Waqf Tribunal — a quasi-judicial body empowered to decide such disputes.
In fact, the Supreme Court of India, in multiple judgments, has emphasized that the rights of private individuals cannot be taken away arbitrarily. A recent 2024 ruling clarified that a property cannot be declared Waqf without giving the affected party an opportunity to be heard.
Claim 2: Waqf Property Is Only for Mosques
Verdict: Misleading
While a significant portion of Waqf properties are indeed mosques, dargahs (shrines), or graveyards, the scope of Waqf is much broader. Waqf can be created for:
- Establishing schools, colleges, or madrasas
- Funding healthcare or hospitals
- Supporting poor and needy individuals
- Building community halls or orphanages
In fact, many educational institutions and charitable trusts in India operate on Waqf land. The intention behind Waqf is often social welfare, not just religious practice.
Claim 3: Once a Property Is Declared Waqf, It Can Never Be Reclaimed
Verdict: Partially True
Yes, under Islamic jurisprudence and Indian law, a Waqf is meant to be permanent and irrevocable. However, disputes over the legitimacy of Waqf status or over the management of Waqf properties can be taken to a Waqf Tribunal or even a High Court.
In some cases, if a property was wrongly declared Waqf, courts have ordered its restoration to the original owner. Additionally, Section 51 of the Waqf Act allows for lease, exchange, or redevelopment of Waqf land under certain conditions, especially when it serves the original charitable purpose more effectively.
Claim 4: Waqf Boards Are Unaccountable and Function Above the Law
Verdict: False
This is a common misconception. Waqf Boards are statutory bodies constituted under the Waqf Act, and they are subject to the rule of law. Their accounts are audited, and they report to the Central Waqf Council and the Ministry of Minority Affairs. They are also answerable to courts and tribunals for any irregularities.
There have been concerns about mismanagement or corruption in some Waqf Boards, but that’s a matter of administrative reform — not legal immunity. The Supreme Court, in multiple cases, has held that Waqf Boards must act transparently and within the limits of their statutory authority.
Claim 5: Waqf Properties Are Tax-Free and Used Without Regulation
Verdict: Misleading
Like other religious endowments in India, Waqf properties used for charitable or religious purposes may be exempt from property tax — but this isn’t unique to Waqf. Temples, churches, and gurudwaras also receive similar tax exemptions under applicable state laws.
However, Waqf properties are not beyond regulation. If a Waqf property is leased out for commercial use, that income can be taxed. Moreover, such activities are subject to state development regulations, land-use norms, and local municipal rules.
Claim 6: Waqf Land Covers Over 6 Lakh Acres and Is Growing Unchecked
Verdict: Partially True
Government data suggests there are approximately 6 lakh acres of Waqf land in India, making it one of the largest landowners in the country after the Indian Railways and Defence Ministry. However, this doesn’t mean the Waqf Boards are actively acquiring more land unchecked.
Much of this land was historically donated — centuries ago — and has been listed in government Waqf records. What is indeed a concern is that a large portion is encroached upon or underutilized, and many properties generate little or no revenue for the intended charitable beneficiaries.
Efforts have been made to digitize records and improve transparency through the Waqf Management System of India (WAMSI), but progress remains slow.
Claim 7: Non-Muslims Cannot Legally Challenge Waqf Declarations
Verdict: False
Any individual — regardless of religion — has the legal right to challenge a Waqf declaration if they have an interest or ownership claim in the property. The Waqf Act provides legal remedies through Waqf Tribunals, and appeals can be made to higher courts.
In fact, several non-Muslim landowners have successfully contested Waqf claims by presenting historical land records, sale deeds, or government documents that contradict Waqf Board listings.
Claim 8: Supreme Court Has Given Waqf Boards Unlimited Powers
Verdict: Completely False
This claim likely stems from misinterpretation or selective reading of court judgments. In its 2024 decision, the Supreme Court of India explicitly ruled that Waqf Boards do not have unilateral authority to declare any land as Waqf. It emphasized the need for due process, transparency, and judicial review.
The judgment actually placed greater checks on Waqf Boards, ensuring that their powers remain within constitutional limits and are subject to judicial scrutiny.
The debate surrounding Waqf in India is complex and shaped by history, law, religion, and politics. But amid rising public curiosity and concern, it’s vital to rely on facts, not fear. Waqf institutions, like many others, require reform, transparency, and better governance but they are not outside the law.
Misinformation not only clouds public understanding but also undermines meaningful reform. As citizens, our first responsibility is to seek verified information, ask questions, and think critically especially when the issue at hand is as layered and sensitive as Waqf.
By
xmc.pl says: 
